How this map works
Web pages age; methods should not. Five pictures explain how every number and badge on the map is produced.
Five parts, on every item
Read the provenance rule
Every profile carries the source documents, linked; the verifier, by role, once verified; and the date the profile was checked against its source. Sources have years: a profile built from a 2024 catalog says so. Nothing on this map pretends to be more current than its documents.
Changes and conflicting information are tracked by academic year. A newer document never silently overwrites an older one; conflicts are flagged and resolved in the open.
Four rungs of evidence
Read the four definitions
NOT YET DOCUMENTED No citable source yet. Shown openly; gaps are the map’s to-do list.
DOCUMENTED Backed by at least one citable document: a law, an official catalog, a government publication or a peer-reviewed article, linked on the item.
COMMUNITY-REVIEWED Documented, and reviewed by people who studied or taught at the school without unresolved objections. Repeated or credible feedback flags an item for team review; it never rewrites a profile by itself.
INSTITUTIONALLY VERIFIED ✓ A responsible faculty member or curriculum authority confirms the information, and an official school document supports it. Confirmation plus document, about the same content.
“No” is an answer, not a blank. The finding itself can be Yes, No, Partial or Discontinued.
Two numbers, and a third that waits
Everything measurable is measured; what we judge is scored only after validation.
Keeping country data alive
- Country focal points. One named academic per country owns its updates, instead of a central team chasing everything.
- Visible staleness. Every item shows when it was last checked. An outdated item looks outdated.
- Start small. Updating is tested first in Korea and Malaysia, where focal points exist, before any wider promise.
- Public sources only. Unpublished or co-authored findings enter only with every author’s agreement. Provisional translations say so.